OpenKol
Changelog

What changed,
and what it changed

Scoring changes are marked where they altered stored results, so you always know whether a report you are looking at predates one.

31 Jul 2026
product

Methodology, pricing and status published

Every scoring weight, the calibration percentiles, and the measurements that came out badly are now on the site rather than in a README. Pricing is prepaid periods with an expiry rather than a subscription, because crypto has no direct debit and pretending otherwise would only surprise people later.

25 Jul 2026
scoring

Audience scoring moved to reply content

Scoring engagers by follower count, account age and ratio turned out to be inverted on hand-labelled data — the 'better' accounts were frequently the farmed ones. Reading what people actually wrote took the evaluation from 78% to 91% against a 61% trivial baseline. Account-level signals remain, weighted at roughly what they earned.

Stored results were recomputed. Reports generated before this date carry the earlier version and are not directly comparable.
22 Jul 2026
scoring

Profile thresholds calibrated against measured percentiles

The engagement threshold had been guessed at 12 per thousand followers. The measured p75 is 1.4, which had made two of the four profile quadrants structurally unreachable. Thresholds are now re-derived from the distribution rather than hard-coded.

Stored results were recomputed. Reports generated before this date carry the earlier version and are not directly comparable.
18 Jul 2026
fix

Fill costs no longer applied asymmetrically

Slippage was charged to the asset as a full round trip while the peer benchmark was charged nothing, which penalised thin pools against an uncharged median. Liquidity is also reported as of now rather than as of the post, so it is scaled and bounded. Fill costs are shown but deliberately kept out of the scored return.

Stored results were recomputed. Reports generated before this date carry the earlier version and are not directly comparable.
14 Jul 2026
scoring

Returns scored against peer tokens

Absolute return made every call during a market-wide rally look like skill. Performance is now measured in excess of a peer median sampled on the same chain over the same window, which is also why a losing call in a worse week can still score respectably.

Stored results were recomputed. Reports generated before this date carry the earlier version and are not directly comparable.
9 Jul 2026
scoring

Intent classification added

Roughly 31% of a KOL's token posts are not calls at all. Scoring them was dragging every average toward the middle, so posts are now classified before they are scored and non-calls are excluded from aggregates.

2 Jul 2026
product

Results are versioned and reproducible

Every stored result now carries the scoring version it was computed under. Rescoring is explicit and logged rather than silent, so a report you read six months ago still means what it meant then.

Older work predates the corpus being usable for comparison and is not listed. If you need to know exactly how a specific stored result was computed, it carries its own version stamp — send it to us and we will tell you.

Check one post.Stop paying for reach.