In progressA directory is only useful at breadth, and we would rather ship it late than ship a shortlist and call it a market. It opens when the coverage is wide enough that an absence means something.
What you'll be able to do
Filter on things that predict nothing about the market and everything about the account
Selection is the one moment where measurement genuinely helps, because it happens before the money moves.
Sort by volume per 1k
The single number that separates accounts and that nobody is currently gaming, because nobody is currently measuring it.
Filter by profile
Show only quiet-audience-real-money accounts. Or find the loud ones deliberately, if reach is genuinely what you're buying.
Filter by chain and size
An account that moves money on one chain often does nothing on another. Coverage follows the market rather than a fixed list.
The rules
What will and won't be in it
A public ranking with real names on it is the highest-risk thing this product could publish, so the constraints are decided in advance rather than after the first complaint.
Ranked on impact and profile only
Both are measurements of what happened after a post. Neither is a judgement about a person, and neither implies anything about their next one.
No performance leaderboard
We measured whether returns persist between an account's calls. They do not. A “best KOLs” ranking would be a claim our own data refutes, so it will not exist.
Nothing accusatory
Experimental signals stay private to whoever ran the check. Labelling a named person publicly on an unvalidated detector is the single most damaging thing we could do, and it is not a risk worth any amount of engagement.
Confirmed contracts only
An entry needs calls where the token was resolved by contract address, not inferred from a ticker. A wrong-token score attached to a real name is a dispute we would deserve to lose.
Correction on request
Anyone listed can challenge a specific entry. Factual errors get fixed. Unflattering accuracy does not.
Questions